
The 2021 contribution rate was set at 1.2% up to the taxable wage limit of $128,298 with a maximum contribution of $1,539.58 per employee. The federal Family and Medical Leave ActĮmployee contributions - through payroll deductions - fund California's paid family leave program and its SDI program.California's Family Rights Act (when leave is not due to pregnancy).California's Pregnancy Disability Leave.SDI:Ī non work-related injury or illness that keeps them from workingĮligible employees can also receive PFL to:Ĭalifornia's PFL program can run concurrently with: Employers in the state may offer SDI and PFL as Voluntary Disability Insurance. Intermittent LeavesĮmployees can take their leave on an intermittent basis or all at once.Īll information on this page is subject to change as state requirements change.Ĭalifornia provides State Disability Insurance and PFL to eligible employees with qualifying reasons. There is a seven-day waiting period for SDI. Benefits are payable as of the first day of covered leave. There is no waiting period for Paid Family Leave. In 2022, the maximum weekly benefit increased to $1,540.

Bond with a new child (including those of the spouse or domestic partner) after:Īn employee's benefit amount is based on the quarter with the highest wages earned within the base period.Įmployees can receive benefits of 60% to 70% of their weekly wages earned during the base period depending on income.įor 2021, the maximum weekly benefit was $1,357 per week.Care for a non-work related disability under CA State Disability Insurance.Retirement Readiness Survey Infographic.Workplace PossibilitiesSM (Disability Management).Relatively Speaking (Paid Family Leave).Proactive Support, Better Disability Outcomes.Importance of Non-Medical Insurance Infographic.Life and Accidental Death & Dismemberment.All rights reserved.Other Contacts Individuals & Families Brokers & Advisors Dental Providers Mobile - Businesses Navigation Health behaviors Mental health Natural experiment Obesity Paid family leave Policy evaluation.Ĭopyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. Future studies should examine the effects of more recently implemented state and local PFL policies to determine whether variation in policy implementation and generosity affects outcomes. These findings suggest that California's PFL policy had positive impacts on several health outcomes, providing timely evidence to inform ongoing policy discussions at the federal and state levels.

Results were robust to alternative specifications. Improvements in health status and psychological distress were greater for mothers, and reductions in alcohol use were greater for fathers. We found improvements in self-rated health and psychological distress, as well as decreased likelihood of being overweight and reduced alcohol consumption. Outcomes included self-rated health, psychological distress, overweight and obesity, and alcohol use. We used detailed longitudinal sociodemographic information about study participants and a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences analytic technique to examine the effects of California's PFL policy on families who were likely eligible for the paid leave, while accounting for underlying trends in these outcomes among states that did not implement PFL policies in this period.

Data were drawn from the 1993-2017 waves of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, a large diverse national cohort study of U.S. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that California's PFL policy-implemented in 2004-improved parent health outcomes. states have implemented PFL policies in recent years, there are few studies that examine the effects of these policies on health. is the only high-income country without a national paid family leave (PFL) policy.
